Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795645›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Cell-specific imputation of drug connectivity mapping with incomplete data.

Diana Sapashnik, Rebecca Newman, Christopher Michael Pietras, Di Zhou, Kapil Devkota, Fangfang Qu, Lior Kofman, Sean Boudreau, Inbar Fried, Donna K Slonim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diana SapashnikDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Rebecca NewmanDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Christopher Michael PietrasDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Di ZhouDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Kapil DevkotaDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Fangfang QuDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Lior KofmanDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Sean BoudreauDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.
Inbar FriedDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Donna K SlonimDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3357-437X

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
A Molecular Assessment of the Consequences of Preterm BirthR01HD076140 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI SLONIM, DONNA K. · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repositioning allows expedited discovery of new applications for existing compounds, but re-screening vast compound libraries is often prohibitively expensive. "Connectivity mapping" is a process that links drugs to diseases by identifying compounds whose impact on expression in a collection of cells reverses the disease's impact on expression in disease-relevant tissues. The LINCS project has expanded the universe of compounds and cells for which data are available, but even with this effort, many clinically useful combinations are missing. To evaluate the possibility of repurposing drugs despite missing data, we compared collaborative filtering using either neighborhood-based or SVD imputation methods to two naive approaches via cross-validation. Methods were evaluated for their ability to predict drug connectivity despite missing data. Predictions improved when cell type was taken into account. Neighborhood collaborative filtering was the most successful method, with the best improvements in non-immortalized primary cells. We also explored which classes of compounds are most and least reliant on cell type for accurate imputation. We conclude that even for cells in which drug responses have not been fully characterized, it is possible to identify unassayed drugs that reverse in those cells the expression signatures observed in disease.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID36795645
PMCPMC9934325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.