Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795432›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Genomic Biomarkers Associated with Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Brett L Ecker, Alice J Tao, Quisette P Janssen, Henry S Walch, Colin M Court, Vinod P Balachandran, Christopher H Crane, Michael I D'Angelica, Jeffrey A Drebin, T Peter Kingham and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Impact of Tumor Genomic Profile on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results From the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Association betweenBiomedicines · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brett L EckerHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-9261
Alice J TaoWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3786-4243
Quisette P JanssenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9353-8293
Henry S WalchMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1188-350X
Colin M CourtHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-8957
Vinod P BalachandranHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2956-223X
Christopher H CraneDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-2784
Michael I D'AngelicaHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3731-0534
Jeffrey A DrebinHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-2062
T Peter KinghamHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3359-3186
Kevin C SoaresHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-017X
Christine A Iacobuzio-DonahueDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-3023
Efsevia VakianiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0227-3523
Mithat GonenDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-8477
Eileen M O'ReillyWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-9199
Anna M VargheseWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5426-0885
William R JarnaginHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1635-5768
Alice C WeiHepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2505-959X
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USErasmus MC · NLRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet there are few validated biomarkers to guide therapy selection. We aimed to determine whether somatic genomic biomarkers predict response to induction FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis single-institution cohort study included consecutive patients (N = 322) with localized PDAC (2011-2020) who received at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX (N = 271) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (N = 51) as initial treatment. We assessed somatic alterations in four driver genes (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4) by targeted next-generation sequencing, and determined associations between these alterations and (1) rate of metastatic progression during induction chemotherapy, (2) surgical resection, and (3) complete/major pathologic response.

resultsThe alteration rates in driver genes KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 were 87.0%, 65.5%, 26.7%, and 19.9%, respectively. For patients receiving first-line FOLFIRINOX, SMAD4 alterations were uniquely associated with metastatic progression (30.0% vs. 14.5%; P = 0.009) and decreased rate of surgical resection (37.1% vs. 66.7%; P < 0.001). For patients receiving induction gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, alterations in SMAD4 were not associated with metastatic progression (14.3% vs. 16.2%; P = 0.866) nor decreased rate of surgical resection (33.3% vs. 41.9%; P = 0.605). Major pathologic response was rare (6.3%) and not associated with type of chemotherapy regimen.

conclusionsSMAD4 alterations were associated with more frequent development of metastasis and lower probability of reaching surgical resection during neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX but not gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Confirmation in a larger, diverse patient cohort will be important before prospective evaluation of SMAD4 as a genomic biomarker to guide treatment selection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCohort StudiesDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGenomicsHumansInduction ChemotherapyPaclitaxelProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AlbuminsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilPaclitaxelProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID36795432
PMCPMC10073273
OpenAlexW4321002277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.