Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795320›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

Laparoscopic resection of presacral benign tumors with rectum preservation.

Chaolin Deng, Bin Wu

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaolin DengDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Bin WuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. wubin0279@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-6987
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2021-I2M-1-015National High-level hospital clinical research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple surgical approaches are available for the treatment of presacral tumors. In patients with presacral tumors, surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment option. However, the anatomical structures of the pelvis are not readily accessible using traditional approaches. Herein, we present a surgical technique for laparoscopic presacral benign tumor resection with rectal preservation. Surgical videos of two patients were used to introduce the laparoscopic procedure. First, the tumor of a 30-year-old woman with presacral cysts was observed during physical examination. As the tumor continued to enlarge, it increased rectal compression and altered bowel habits. The patient's surgical video was used to present complete laparoscopic presacral resection. Several video clips of a second 30-year-old woman with cysts were used to present the details and precautions of the resection. Neither of the patients required conversion to an open surgical approach. Complete surgical excision of the tumors was achieved, without rectal injury. Both patients had no postoperative complications and were discharged on postoperative 5-6 days. The laparoscopic approach for presacral benign tumors is superior in terms of manipulability compared with the conventional approach. Therefore, we recommend that the laparoscopy approach should be considered as the standard surgical approach for presacral benign tumors.

Indexed as

CystsLaparoscopyRectal DiseasesRectal NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansPelvisRectumlaparoscopic surgerypresacral benign tumorsurgical approachtreatment strategy

Identifiers

PMID36795320
OpenAlexW4321003999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.