Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795276›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2023

Using Project ECHO to Keep Professionals Well at Work: Individual and Organizational Outcomes.

Ginny Sprang, Stephanie Gusler, Scott LaJoie, Jessica Eslinger, Emily Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ginny SprangUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. sprang@uky.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-1105
Stephanie GuslerUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Scott LaJoieUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jessica EslingerUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Emily SmithUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

SAMHSA HHS #SM19003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe toll of COVID-19 stress on the mental health of the workforce has been well-documented. The present study examined the use of the Project ECHO framework to provide practices and resources on stress management and emotion regulation to increase individual and organizational health and well-being.

methodsThree independent ECHOs were designed and conducted over an 18-month period. Data was collected on the implementation of new learning and comparisons of organizational efforts toward being more secondary trauma responsive from baseline to post initiative, using cloud-based survey methods.

resultsFindings suggest that the use of micro-interventions at the organizational level improved over time in the areas of resilience-building and policy-making, and that individuals were actively integrating skills related to managing their stress.

conclusionsLessons learned adapting and implementing ECHO strategies in the midst of a pandemic are offered, as well as how to cultivate wellness champions in the workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMental HealthPandemicsWorkforceCOVIDProfessional well-beingProject ECHOSecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID36795276
PMCPMC9933790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.