Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795234›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2023

The economic impact of anastomotic leak after colorectal cancer surgery.

Blas Flor-Lorente, José Francisco Noguera-Aguilar, Salvadora Delgado-Rivilla, José María García-González, Marcos Rodriguez-Martín, Laura Salinas-Ortega, Miguel Ángel Casado, María Álvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Management of anastomotic leak after elective anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blas Flor-LorenteColorectal Surgery Unit. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
José Francisco Noguera-AguilarColorectal Surgery Unit. Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Salvadora Delgado-RivillaColorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Tarrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
José María García-GonzálezColorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Bilbao, Spain.
Marcos Rodriguez-MartínColorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Beata María Ana, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Salinas-OrtegaPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-0659
Miguel Ángel CasadoPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8743-6653
María ÁlvarezHealth Economics & Outcomes Research Unit (Medtronic Ibérica, S.A.), Madrid, Spain. maria.alvarez.orozco@medtronic.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-6978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the economic impact of the incremental consumption of resources for the diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leak (AL) in patients after resection with anastomosis for colorectal cancer compared to patients without AL on the Spanish health system.

methodThis study included a literature review with parameters validated by experts and the development of a cost analysis model to estimate the incremental resource consumption of patients with AL versus those without. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) colon cancer (CC) with resection, anastomosis and AL; 2) rectal cancer (RC) with resection, anastomosis without protective stoma and AL; and 3) RC with resection, anastomosis with protective stoma and AL.

resultsThe average total incremental cost per patient was €38,819 and €32,599 for CC and RC, respectively. The cost of AL diagnosis per patient was €1018 (CC) and €1030 (RC). The cost of AL treatment per patient in Group 1 ranged from €13,753 (type B) to €44,985 (type C + stoma), that in Group 2 ranged from €7348 (type A) to €44,398 (type C + stoma), and that in Group 3 ranged from €6197 (type A) to €34,414 (type C). Hospital stays represented the highest cost for all groups. In RC, protective stoma was found to minimize the economic consequences of AL.

conclusionsThe appearance of AL generates a considerable increase in the consumption of health resources, mainly due to an increase in hospital stays. The more complex the AL, the higher the cost associated with its treatment. INTEREST OF THE STUDY: it is the first cost-analysis study of AL after CR surgery based on prospective, observational and multicenter studies, with a clear, accepted and uniform definition of AL and estimated over a period of 30 days.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakColorectal cancerCostResectionSpainStoma

Identifiers

PMID36795234
PMCPMC9933261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.