ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2023
Minimum Detectable Differences in Electrocochleography Measurements: Bayesian-Based Predictions.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Human Auditory Nerve (AN) and Brainstem Function Through Level-Dependent Chirps and Predicted AN Firing Distributions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Article
- Developing a Calibration Method to Minimize Variability in Auditory Evoked Potentials.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- Evidence for the Auditory Nerve Generating Envelope Following Responses When Measured from Eardrum Electrodes.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review: State of the Science on Diagnostics of Hidden Hearing Loss.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Human Olivocochlear Effects: A Statistical Detection Approach Applied to the Cochlear Microphonic Evoked by Swept Tones.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Effects of contralateral noise on envelope-following responses, auditory-nerve compound action potentials, and otoacoustic emissions measured simultaneously.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Estimation of Cochlear Frequency Selectivity Using a Convolution Model of Forward-Masked Compound Action Potentials.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Physiology of the cochlea and auditory nerve can be assessed with electrocochleography (ECochG), a technique that involves measuring auditory evoked potentials from an electrode placed near or within the cochlea. Research, clinical, and operating room applications of ECochG have in part centered on measuring the auditory nerve compound action potential (AP) amplitude, the summating potential (SP) amplitude, and the ratio of the two (SP/AP). Despite the common use of ECochG, the variability of repeated amplitude measurements for individuals and groups is not well understood. We analyzed ECochG measurements made with a tympanic membrane electrode in a group of younger normal-hearing participants to characterize the within-participant and group-level variability for the AP amplitude, SP amplitude, and SP/AP amplitude ratio. Results show that the measurements have substantial variability and that, especially with smaller sample sizes, significant reduction in variability can be obtained by averaging measurements across repeated electrode placements within subjects. Using a Bayesian-based model of the data, we generated simulated data to predict minimum detectable differences in AP and SP amplitudes for experiments with a given number of participants and repeated measurements. Our findings provide evidence-based recommendations for the design and sample size determination of future experiments using ECochG amplitude measurements, and the evaluation of previous publications in terms of sensitivity to detecting experimental effects on ECochG amplitude measurements. Accounting for the variability of ECochG measurements should result in more consistent results in the clinical and basic assessments of hearing and hearing loss, either hidden or overt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.