Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795197›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2023

Minimum Detectable Differences in Electrocochleography Measurements: Bayesian-Based Predictions.

Shawn S Goodman, Jeffery T Lichtenhan, Skyler G Jennings

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing a Calibration Method to Minimize Variability in Auditory Evoked Potentials.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn S GoodmanDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jeffery T LichtenhanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Skyler G JenningsDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. skyler.jennings@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-8396
University of Iowa · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Influences of the Efferent System on Human Auditory FunctionK23DC014752 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JENNINGS, SKYLER G. · 2016 to 2020
$982k
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC014752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiology of the cochlea and auditory nerve can be assessed with electrocochleography (ECochG), a technique that involves measuring auditory evoked potentials from an electrode placed near or within the cochlea. Research, clinical, and operating room applications of ECochG have in part centered on measuring the auditory nerve compound action potential (AP) amplitude, the summating potential (SP) amplitude, and the ratio of the two (SP/AP). Despite the common use of ECochG, the variability of repeated amplitude measurements for individuals and groups is not well understood. We analyzed ECochG measurements made with a tympanic membrane electrode in a group of younger normal-hearing participants to characterize the within-participant and group-level variability for the AP amplitude, SP amplitude, and SP/AP amplitude ratio. Results show that the measurements have substantial variability and that, especially with smaller sample sizes, significant reduction in variability can be obtained by averaging measurements across repeated electrode placements within subjects. Using a Bayesian-based model of the data, we generated simulated data to predict minimum detectable differences in AP and SP amplitudes for experiments with a given number of participants and repeated measurements. Our findings provide evidence-based recommendations for the design and sample size determination of future experiments using ECochG amplitude measurements, and the evaluation of previous publications in terms of sensitivity to detecting experimental effects on ECochG amplitude measurements. Accounting for the variability of ECochG measurements should result in more consistent results in the clinical and basic assessments of hearing and hearing loss, either hidden or overt.

Indexed as

Audiometry, Evoked ResponseHearingBayes TheoremCochleaEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumansAuditory brainstem responseAuditory nerve compound action potentialBayesianCochlear synaptopathyElectrocochleographySummating potential

Identifiers

PMID36795197
PMCPMC10121985
OpenAlexW4321003215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.