Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795195›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Pattern of recurrence and overall survival in esophagogastric cancer after perioperative FLOT and clinical outcomes in MSI-H population: the PROSECCO Study.

Floriana Nappo, Lorenzo Fornaro, Luca Pompella, Silvia Catanese, Daniele Lavacchi, Andrea Spallanzani, Alessandro Cappetta, Marco Puzzoni, Sabina Murgioni, Giulia Barsotti and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Perioperative Tailored Treatments for Gastric Cancer: Times Are Changing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Floriana Nappo *Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy. floriana.nappo@iov.veneto.it.
Lorenzo Fornaro *Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Luca PompellaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Silvia CataneseMedical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Daniele LavacchiClinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Andrea SpallanzaniDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alessandro CappettaDepartment of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Azienda ULSS8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Marco PuzzoniMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Sabina MurgioniMedical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Giulia BarsottiMedical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe TirinoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio PellinoDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Toscana Nord Ovest, Livorno, Italy.
Caterina VivaldiMedical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Antonia StrippoliComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe AprileDepartment of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Azienda ULSS8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Samantha Di DonatoMedical Oncology Department, Nuovo Ospedale-Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy.
Elena MazzaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Università Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, 20019, Milan, Italy.
Michele PrisciandaroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoClinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Vittorina ZagonelMedical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Stefano CascinuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Università Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, 20019, Milan, Italy.
Ferdinando De Vita *Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Sara Lonardi *Medical Oncology 3, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Istituto Oncologico Veneto · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale San Bortolo · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITNuovo Ospedale di Prato · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFLOT regimen is the standard perioperative treatment in Western countries for patients with locally advanced gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and Mismatch Repair deficient (dMMR) demonstrated a favorable prognostic role and a concomitant negative predictive impact on the benefit of perioperative 5-fluorouracil-based doublets; however, its role in pts receiving FLOT chemotherapy is still unclear.

methodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter observational study of 265 pts with GC/GEJC treated with perioperative FLOT regimen in 11 Italian oncology centers between January 2017 to December 2021 and analyzed for microsatellite status.

resultsThe MSI-H phenotype was found in 27 (10.2%) of 265 analyzed tumors. Compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) and Mismatch Repair proficient (pMMR) cases, MSI-H/dMMR were more frequently female (48.1% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.0424), elderly pts (age > 70 years, 44.4% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.0003), Laurens's intestinal type (62.5% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.02) and pts with a primary location tumor in the antrum (37 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0004). A statistically significant difference in the rate of pathologically negative lymph node emerged (63% vs 30.7%, p = 0.0018). Compared to the MSS/pMMR tumor population, the MSI-H/dMMR subgroup had a better DFS (median not reached [NR] vs. 19.5 [15.59-23.59] mos, p = 0.031) and OS (median NR vs. 34.84 [26.68-47.60] mos, p = 0.0316).

conclusionsThese real-world data confirm that FLOT treatment is effective in daily clinical practice for locally advanced GC/GEJC, also in the MSI-H/dMMR subgroup. It also showed a higher rate of nodal status downstaging and a better outcome of MSI-H/dMMR pts in comparison to MSS/pMMR.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryRetrospective StudiesFLOTGastric cancerGastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinomaMicrosatellite instability statusPerioperative chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36795195
PMCPMC10356632
OpenAlexW4321004294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.