Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36795008›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2023

Treatment of vulvar cancer recurrences with electrochemotherapy - a detailed analysis of possible causes for unsuccessful treatment.

Gregor Vivod, Tanja Jesenko, Gorana Gasljevic, Nina Kovacevic, Masa Bosnjak, Gregor Sersa, Sebastjan Merlo, Maja Cemazar

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregor VivodDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tanja JesenkoMedical Faculty Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gorana GasljevicDepartment Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina KovacevicDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Masa BosnjakDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gregor SersaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sebastjan MerloDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja CemazarDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrochemotherapy has good local effectiveness in the treatment of vulvar cancer. Most studies have reported the safety and effectiveness of electrochemotherapy for palliative treatment of gynecological cancers and mostly vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Some tumors, however, fail to respond to electrochemotherapy. The biological features/determinants for the nonresponsiveness are not determined yet. PATIENT AND

methodsA recurrence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma was treated by electrochemotherapy using intravenous administration of bleomycin. The treatment was performed by hexagonal electrodes according to standard operating procedures. We analyzed the factors that could determine nonresponsiveness to electrochemotherapy.

resultsBased on the presented case of nonresponsive vulvar recurrence to electrochemotherapy, we hypothesize that the vasculature of the tumors prior to treatment may predict the response to electrochemotherapy. The histological analysis showed minimal presence of blood vessels in the tumor. Thus, low perfusion may reduce drug delivery and lead to a lower response rate because of the minor antitumor effectiveness of vascular disruption. In this case, no immune response in the tumor was elicited by electrochemotherapy.

conclusionsIn this case, of nonresponsive vulvar recurrence treated by electrochemotherapy, we analyzed possible factors that could predict treatment failure. Based on histological analysis, low vascularization of the tumor was observed, which hampered drug delivery and distribution and resulted in no vascular disrupting action of electro-chemotherapy. All these factors could contribute to ineffective treatment with electrochemotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellElectrochemotherapyVulvar NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBleomycinFemaleHumansAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBleomycinbleomycinelectrochemotherapyrecurrencevulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID36795008
PMCPMC10039473
OpenAlexW4321004269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.