Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794998›Full record

Trial reportRadiology and oncology2023

Comparison of CalliSpheres

Zhongxing Shi, Dongqing Wang, Tanrong Kang, Ru Yi, Liming Cui, Huijie Jiang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiology and oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhongxing ShiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dongqing WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Tanrong KangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ru YiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Liming CuiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Huijie JiangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis trial aimed to compare the outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 90 patients were divided into DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and cTACE group (n = 45). The treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe objective response rate (ORR) in the DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up (

conclusionsDEB-TACE with CSM showed better treatment response and survival benefits than cTACE group. Although a transient more severe liver damage, high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain occurred in the DEB-TACE group, it could be resolved through symptomatic treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAbdominal PainHumansMicrospheresTreatment OutcomeCalliSpheres® microspherescTACEDEB-TACEhepatocellular carcinomatumor response

Identifiers

PMID36794998
PMCPMC10039469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.