Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794952›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2023

Autonomic nervous system and endocrine system response to upper and lower cervical spine mobilization in healthy male adults: a randomized crossover trial.

Gerard Farrell, Matthew Reily-Bell, Cathy Chapple, Ewan Kennedy, Kesava Sampath, Angela Spontelli Gisselman, Chad Cook, Rajesh Katare, Steve Tumilty

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerard FarrellCentre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, North Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-6546
Matthew Reily-BellDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Cathy ChappleCentre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, North Dunedin, New Zealand.
Ewan KennedyCentre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, North Dunedin, New Zealand.
Kesava SampathCentre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology-Rotokauri Campus, Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand.
Angela Spontelli GisselmanSchool of Medicine, Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Phoenix, USA.
Chad CookDoctor of Physical Therapy Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rajesh KatareDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Steve TumiltyCentre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, North Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZDuke University · USTufts University · USWaikato Institute of Technology · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical spine mobilizations may differentially modulate both components of the stress response, consisting of the autonomic nervous system and hypothalamic pituitary adrenal-axis, depending on whether the target location is the upper or lower cervical spine. To date, no study has investigated this.

methodsA randomized, crossover trial investigated the effects of upper versus lower cervical mobilization on both components of the stress response simultaneously. The primary outcome was salivary cortisol (sCOR) concentration. The secondary outcome was heart rate variability measured with a smartphone application. Twenty healthy males, aged 21-35, were included. Participants were randomly assigned to block-AB (upper then lower cervical mobilization,

resultsWithin groups, sCOR concentration reduced thirty-minutes following lower cervical mobilization (

conclusionThere was a statistically significant reduction in sCOR concentration following lower cervical spine mobilization, and between-group difference, 30 min following the intervention. This indicates that mobilizations applied to separate target locations within the cervical spine can differentially modulate the stress response.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalNeckAdultAutonomic Nervous SystemCervical VertebraeCross-Over StudiesHumansHydrocortisoneMaleHydrocortisonecortisolheart rate variabilityhypothalamic pituitary adrenal-axisManual therapymusculoskeletal manipulationsstress response

Identifiers

PMID36794952
PMCPMC10642313
OpenAlexW4321002348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.