ArticleCartilage2023
Glenohumeral Cartilage Thickness: Implications in Prosthetic Design and Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation.
Article in Cartilage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Four-dimensional computed tomography can visualise the in vivo glenoid track and quantify dynamic glenohumeral contact mechanics during active motion in subjects with shoulder instability: A preliminary study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Remplissage With Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Reducing Anterior Humeral Head Displacement by Implanting Anchors in the Upper Region of Hill-Sachs Lesions.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing sensitivity of predictive shoulder simulations to uncertain soft tissue properties.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Postoperative Variations in Shoulder Biomechanics and Kinematics in the Abduction and External Rotation Position After Remplissage With Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Finite Element Analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA complete understanding of the glenohumeral joint anatomy is crucial for osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation and prosthetic design. However, existing data on the cartilage thickness distribution are not consistent. This study aims to describe the cartilage thickness distribution at both the glenoid cavity and humeral head in males and females.
designSixteen fresh cadaveric shoulder specimens were dissected and separated to expose the glenoid and humeral head articular surfaces. The glenoid and humeral head were cut into 5-mm coronal sections. Sections were imaged and cartilage thickness was measured at 5 standardized points on each section. Measurements were analyzed based on age, sex, and regional location.
resultsFor the humeral head, cartilage was thickest centrally (M = 1.77 ± 0.35 mm) and thinnest superiorly and inferiorly (M = 1.42 ± 0.37 mm, 1.42 ± 0.29 mm). At the glenoid cavity, cartilage was thickest in the superior and inferior areas (M = 2.61 ± 0.47 mm, 2.53 ± 0.58 mm) and thinnest centrally (M = 1.69 ± 0.22 mm). Males were found to have thicker cartilage at both the humeral head and glenoid (
conclusionsArticular cartilage thickness distribution of the glenoid and humeral head is nonuniform and reciprocal in nature. These results can be used to further inform prosthetic design and OCA transplantation. We noted a significant difference in cartilage thickness between males and females. This suggests that the sex of the patient should be taken into consideration when matching donors for OCA transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.