Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794804›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

Co-cultivation is a powerful approach to produce a robust functionally designed synthetic consortium as a live biotherapeutic product (LBP).

Fabienne Kurt, Gabriel E Leventhal, Marianne Rebecca Spalinger, Laura Anthamatten, Philipp Rogalla von Bieberstein, Carmen Menzi, Markus Reichlin, Marco Meola, Florian Rosenthal, Gerhard Rogler and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing the microbiome for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mathematical Modeling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosing and engineering gut microbiomes.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabienne KurtPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7950-2721
Gabriel E LeventhalPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4463-166X
Marianne Rebecca SpalingerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-0058
Laura AnthamattenPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Philipp Rogalla von BiebersteinPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-3285
Carmen MenziPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-3183
Markus ReichlinPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-5741
Marco MeolaPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-1514
Florian RosenthalPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Gerhard RoglerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-9188
Christophe LacroixLaboratory of Food Biotechnology, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4360-2020
Tomas de WoutersPharmaBiome AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-2338
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of fecal microbiota transplants (FMT) has provided the necessary proof-of-concept for microbiome therapeutics. Yet, feces-based therapies have many associated risks and uncertainties, and hence defined microbial consortia that modify the microbiome in a targeted manner have emerged as a promising safer alternative to FMT. The development of such live biotherapeutic products has important challenges, including the selection of appropriate strains and the controlled production of the consortia at scale. Here, we report on an ecology- and biotechnology-based approach to microbial consortium construction that overcomes these issues. We selected nine strains that form a consortium to emulate the central metabolic pathways of carbohydrate fermentation in the healthy human gut microbiota. Continuous co-culturing of the bacteria produces a stable and reproducible consortium whose growth and metabolic activity are distinct from an equivalent mix of individually cultured strains. Further, we showed that our function-based consortium is as effective as FMT in counteracting dysbiosis in a dextran sodium sulfate mouse model of acute colitis, while an equivalent mix of strains failed to match FMT. Finally, we showed robustness and general applicability of our approach by designing and producing additional stable consortia of controlled composition. We propose that combining a bottom-up functional design with continuous co-cultivation is a powerful strategy to produce robust functionally designed synthetic consortia for therapeutic use.

Indexed as

ColitisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansMiceanaerobic carbohydrate metabolismconsortium designcontinuous co-cultivationdivision of laborlive biotherapeutic products (LBP)Microbiome therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID36794804
PMCPMC9980632
OpenAlexW4321003976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.