Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794681›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

Rural family medicine as a career option among Hungarian medical students.

András Mohos, Gergő József Szőllősi, László Róbert Kolozsvári, Jozsef Rinfel, Albert Varga, Maria Marko Kucsera, Csenge Hargittay, Peter Torzsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

András MohosAlbert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, Department of Family Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Gergő József SzőllősiGottsegen Gyorgy Orszagos Kardiologiai Intezet, Budapest, 1096 Hungary.
László Róbert KolozsváriDepartment of Family Medicine and Occupational Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-0898
Jozsef RinfelInstitute of Primary Care, Pecs, Hungary.
Albert VargaAlbert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, Department of Family Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Maria Marko KucseraAlbert Szent-Gyögyi Medical School, Department of Public Health, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Csenge HargittayFamily Medicine, Semmelweiss University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter TorzsaFamily Medicine, Semmelweiss University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe shortage of family physicians is a considerable challenge in Hungary. The number of vacant practices is increasing and the rural and deprived areas are more affected.

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate medical students' attitudes towards rural family medicine.

methodsThe current study used a cross-sectional design with a self-administered questionnaire. Each of the four Hungarian medical universities was represented by their medical students from December 2019 to April 2020.

resultsThe response rate was 67.3% (

conclusionFamily medicine is not a popular career option among Hungarian medical students and rural medical work is even less attractive. Medical students with a rural origin and an interest in family medicine are more likely to plan to work in rural areas. More objective information and experience need to be given to medical students about rural family medicine to increase the attractiveness of the speciality.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesStudents, MedicalCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeHumansHungarySurveys and QuestionnairesCareer choicefamily medicineHungarymedical studentrural medicine

Identifiers

PMID36794681
PMCPMC9937003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.