Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794486›Full record

ArticlePerfusion2024

Efficacy of propofol-supplemented cardioplegia on biomarkers of organ injury in patients having cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: A protocol for a randomised controlled study (ProMPT2).

Rachael Heys, Gianni D Angelini, Katherine Joyce, Helena Smartt, Lucy Culliford, Rachel Maishman, Samantha E de Jesus, Costanza Emanueli, M-Saadeh Suleiman, Prakash Punjabi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Perfusion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael HeysBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gianni D AngeliniBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-3730
Katherine JoyceBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5539-7178
Helena SmarttBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lucy CullifordBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rachel MaishmanBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Samantha E de JesusBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Costanza EmanueliNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
M-Saadeh SuleimanBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Prakash PunjabiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-1603
Chris A RogersBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ben GibbisonDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-6212
University of Bristol · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/15/1/31199British Heart Foundation CH/1992027/7163British Heart Foundation PG/14/72/31080Department of Health 15/180/55
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest is known to be responsible for ischaemia and reperfusion organ injury. In a previous study, ProMPT, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass or aortic valve surgery we demonstrated improved cardiac protection when supplementing the cardioplegia solution with propofol (6 mcg/ml). The aim of the ProMPT2 study is to determine whether higher levels of propofol added to the cardioplegia could result in increased cardiac protection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ProMPT2 study is a multi-centre, parallel, three-group, randomised controlled trial in adults undergoing non-emergency isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. A total of 240 patients will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either cardioplegia supplementation with high dose of propofol (12 mcg/ml), low dose of propofol (6 mcg/ml) or placebo (saline). The primary outcome is myocardial injury, assessed by serial measurements of myocardial troponin T up to 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include biomarkers of renal function (creatinine) and metabolism (lactate). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received research ethics approval from South Central - Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in September 2018. Any findings will be shared though peer-reviewed publications and presented at international and national meetings. Participants will be informed of results through patient organisations and newsletters.

trial registrationISRCTN15255199. Registered in March 2019.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiopulmonary BypassHeart Arrest, InducedPropofolAdultCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersPropofolcardiac surgerycardioplegiacardiopulmonary bypassischemiapropofolrandomised controlled trialreperfusion

Identifiers

PMID36794486
PMCPMC7617284
OpenAlexW4321003463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.