Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794283›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2023

Evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the SELECT phase 3 trials.

Philip G Conaghan, Karel Pavelka, Song-Chou Hsieh, Terri-Leigh Bonnington, Toby C Kent, Katie Marchbank, Christopher J Edwards

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02629159 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Background of Methotrexate (MTX) and Who Have an Inadequate Response to MTX (MTX-IR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2015 to 2027Enrolled1,629ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPlacebo for Adalimumab, Adalimumab, Placebo for Upadacitinib, Upadacitinib
NCT02675426 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) and Have an Inadequate Response to csDMARDs

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2015 to 2022Enrolled661ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPlacebo, Upadacitinib
NCT02706847 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2016 to 2022Enrolled499ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPlacebo, Upadacitinib
NCT02706951 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) Monotherapy to Methotrexate (MTX) in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response to MTX

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2016 to 2022Enrolled648ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsMethotrexate, Upadacitinib, Placebo Upadacitinib, Placebo Methotrexate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Saudi consensus guidance for the management of inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-5665
Karel PavelkaInstitute of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Song-Chou HsiehInternational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Terri-Leigh BonningtonMedical, AbbVie Ltd, Chicago, IL, USA.
Toby C KentMedical, AbbVie Ltd, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katie MarchbankMedical, AbbVie Ltd, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher J EdwardsNIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8233-6602
AbbVie (United States) · USCharles University · CZNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Moderately active RA is associated with poor patient outcomes. Despite this, some health systems have restricted access to advanced therapies to those with severe RA. There is also limited evidence of the efficacy of advanced therapies in the moderately active RA population. This post-hoc analysis from four phase 3 trials explored the efficacy of upadacitinib (UPA) for moderately active RA. Methods: Patients included in this analysis received UPA 15 mg once daily [monotherapy after switching from MTX or in combination with stable background conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs)] or placebo. Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes were analysed separately for patients with moderate disease activity {28-joint count DAS using CRP [DAS28(CRP)] of >3.2 and ≤5.1} and severe disease activity [DAS28(CRP) >5.1]. Results: Patients with moderate disease activity who received UPA 15 mg (combination or monotherapy) after an inadequate response to biologic DMARDs and/or csDMARDs were significantly more likely to achieve a 20% improvement in the ACR response criteria, low disease activity status [DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2] or clinical remission [DAS28(CRP) < 2.6] by week 12/14 Conclusion: This analysis provides support for the use of UPA for the treatment of patients with moderate RA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: SELECT-NEXT: NCT02675426; SELECT-COMPARE: NCT02629159; SELECT-MONOTHERAPY: NCT02706951; SELECT-BEYOND: NCT02706847.

Indexed as

JAK inhibitorsmoderatemoderate disease activityRAupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID36794283
PMCPMC9924096
OpenAlexW4319594583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.