Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794267›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Deep learning based tumor-stroma ratio scoring in colon cancer correlates with microscopic assessment.

Marloes A Smit, Francesco Ciompi, John-Melle Bokhorst, Gabi W van Pelt, Oscar G F Geessink, Hein Putter, Rob A E M Tollenaar, J Han J M van Krieken, Wilma E Mesker, Jeroen A W M van der Laak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marloes A SmitDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Francesco CiompiDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
John-Melle BokhorstDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Gabi W van PeltDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Oscar G F GeessinkDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Han J M van KriekenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Wilma E MeskerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen A W M van der LaakDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The amount of stroma within the primary tumor is a prognostic parameter for colon cancer patients. This phenomenon can be assessed using the tumor-stroma ratio (TSR), which classifies tumors in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (>50% stroma). Although the reproducibility for TSR determination is good, improvement might be expected from automation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the scoring of the TSR in a semi- and fully automated method using deep learning algorithms is feasible. Methods: A series of 75 colon cancer slides were selected from a trial series of the UNITED study. For the standard determination of the TSR, 3 observers scored the histological slides. Next, the slides were digitized, color normalized, and the stroma percentages were scored using semi- and fully automated deep learning algorithms. Correlations were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman rank correlations. Results: 37 (49%) cases were classified as stroma-low and 38 (51%) as stroma-high by visual estimation. A high level of concordance between the 3 observers was reached, with ICCs of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.94 (all P < .001). Between visual and semi-automated assessment the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.23-0.91, P-value 0.005), with a Spearman correlation of 0.88 (P < .001). Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.70 (N=3) were observed for visual estimation versus the fully automated scoring procedures. Conclusion: Good correlations were observed between standard visual TSR determination and semi- and fully automated TSR scores. At this point, visual examination has the highest observer agreement, but semi-automated scoring could be helpful to support pathologists.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceColon carcinomaComputational pathologyDeep learningTumor–stroma ratioVisual estimation

Identifiers

PMID36794267
PMCPMC9922811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.