ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023
Divergence and convergence in international regulatory policies regarding genome-edited food: How to find a middle ground.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk governance of transgenic plants: bridging science, policy, and public trust.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Evolution and implementation of EU regulation on new genomic techniques.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Bridging Biosynthesis and Bioavailability: Integrated Strategies for Tailoring Soybean Isoflavone Profiles.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Review
- Achieving High-Density and Stress-Resilient Maize Breeding Via Germplasm Innovation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The NRT1.1-NLP7 Nexus: An Integrative Signaling Nexus from Nitrate Sensing to Systemic Adaptation and Structure-Guided Engineering.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genome editing between wonder and rejection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- AI-assisted crop improvement: new design tools within established regulatory frameworks.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Rethinking gene-edited crop regulation: advancing a Principle-based framework for modern biotechnology governance.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Regulation as key to fulfilling the promises of agricultural genomics: Going beyond bottlenecks in plant gene technology development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Efficient mutagenesis and genotyping of maize inbreds using biolistics, multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 editing, and Indel-Selective PCR.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Novel Proteins for Future Foods: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Regulatory challenges and global trade implications of genome editing in agriculture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Africa and zero hunger agenda: genome editing policy landscape, challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Growing knowledge impact of gene-editing technology on public acceptance: a longitudinal analysis in Japan.GM crops & food · 2024Article
- Global regulatory trends of genome editing technology in agriculture and food.Breeding science · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulations for organisms and products to which genome-editing technologies are applied are increasing in diversity, with the path-dependent effect of previous regulations for genetically modified organisms. Regulations for genome-editing technologies are a patchwork of international regulations that are difficult to harmonize. However, if the approaches are arranged in chronological order and the overall trend is examined, the regulation of genome-edited organisms and GM food products has recently been trending toward a middle ground which can be characterized as "limited convergence." There is a trend toward the adoption of two approaches: one that considers GMOs but tries to apply simplified regulations and another that excludes them from the scope of regulations as non-GMOs but requires confirmation. In this paper, we discuss why there is a tendency toward convergence of these two approaches and examine the challenges and implications of these two approaches for the governance of the agricultural and food sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.