Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36794156›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2023

Effects of mastication on antibody production under fasting conditions in mice.

Seonbu Yang, Yujun Park, Taesaeng Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seonbu YangDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University.
Yujun ParkDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University.
Taesaeng ChoiDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University.
Dankook University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chewing is beneficial not only for digestion and absorption of food, but also for various physiological functions, such as cognition and immunity. In this study, the effect of chewing on hormonal changes and the immune response was investigated under fasting conditions in mice. We investigated leptin and corticosterone levels, which are hormones with well-known associations with immune response and large changes during fasting. To study of effects of chewing under fasting conditions, one group of mice was provided with wooden sticks to stimulate chewing, one group was supplemented with 30% glucose solution, and one group received both treatments. We examined changes in serum leptin and corticosterone levels after 1 and 2 d of fasting. Antibody production was measured 2 weeks after subcutaneous immunization with bovine serum albumin on the last day of fasting. Under fasting conditions, serum leptin levels decreased and serum corticosterone levels increased. Supplementation with 30% glucose solution during fasting increased leptin levels above normal, but had little effect on corticosterone levels. In contrast, chewing stimulation inhibited the increase in corticosterone production, but did not affect the decrease in leptin levels. Antibody production significantly increased under separate and combined treatments. Taken together, our results showed that chewing stimulation during fasting inhibited the increase in corticosterone production and improved antibody production after immunization.

Indexed as

LeptinMasticationAnimalsAntibody FormationCorticosteroneFastingGlucoseMiceCorticosteroneGlucoseLeptinantibodychewingcorticosteronefastingimmunizationleptin

Identifiers

PMID36794156
PMCPMC9925987
OpenAlexW4318825370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.