ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
The efficacy and safety of wedge resection for peripheral stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a real-world study based on a single center.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- WTAP-mediated m6A methylation of SOX2 affects lung adenocarcinoma malignancy via Wnt/β-catenin pathway.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- IGF2BP1-mediated methylation of ABCA1 facilitates tumor progression by affecting cholesterol metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma.Amino acids · 2025Article
- The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- [Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Wedge Resection of Pulmonary in Patients with Small Volume Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Article
- Wedge resection-finding its place in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of segmentectomy for stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (IA-LUAD) has been well-documented. However, the efficacy and safety of wedge resection for peripheral IA-LUAD remains controversial. This study evaluated the feasibility of wedge resection in patients with peripheral IA-LUAD. Methods: Patients with peripheral IA-LUAD who underwent wedge resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were reviewed. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify predictors of recurrence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoffs of identified predictors. Results: A total of 186 patients (female/male, 115/71; mean age, 59.9 years) were included. Mean maximum dimension of consolidation component (MCD) was 5.6 mm, consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) was 37%, and mean computed tomography value of tumor (CTVt) was -285.4 HU. With a median follow-up of 67 months (interquartile range, 52-72 months), the 5-year recurrence rate was 4.84%. Ten patients occurred recurrence postoperatively. No recurrence was observed adjacent to the surgical margin. Increasing MCD, CTR, and CTVt were associated with a higher risk of recurrence, with corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.212 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.120-1.311], 1.054 (95% CI: 1.018-1.092), and 1.012 (95% CI: 1.004-1.019) with optimal cutoffs for predicting recurrence of 10 mm, 60%, and -220 HU, respectively. When a tumor had characteristics under these respective cutoffs, no recurrence was observed. Conclusions: Wedge resection can be considered to be a safe and efficacious management strategy for patients with peripheral IA-LUAD, especially for MCD less than 10 mm, CTR less than 60% and CTVt less than -220 HU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.