ReviewRSC chemical biology2023
Finding a vocation for validation: taking proteomics beyond association and location.
Review in RSC chemical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward decoding spatiotemporal signaling activities of reactive immunometabolites with precision immuno-chemical biology tools.Communications chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First established in the seventies, proteomics, chemoproteomics, and most recently, spatial/proximity-proteomics technologies have empowered researchers with new capabilities to illuminate cellular communication networks that govern sophisticated decision-making processes. With an ever-growing inventory of these advanced proteomics tools, the onus is upon the researchers to understand their individual advantages and limitations, such that we can ensure rigorous implementation and conclusions derived from critical data interpretations backed up by orthogonal series of functional validations. This perspective-based on the authors' experience in applying varied proteomics workflows in complex living models-underlines key book-keeping considerations, comparing and contrasting most-commonly-deployed modern proteomics profiling technologies. We hope this article stimulates thoughts among expert users and equips new-comers with practical knowhow of what has become an indispensable tool in chemical biology, drug discovery, and broader life-science investigations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.