ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2023
Multi-institutional surgical outcomes of robotic single-port surgery: a Korean experience.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- What defines the "value" of robotic surgery for patients with gastrointestinal cancers? Perspectives from a U.S. Cancer Center.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Review
- Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal tumor resection via the lateral intercostal approach: a surgical technique and our ingenuity.Journal of visualized surgery · 2024Article
- Retraction: Multi-institutional surgical outcomes of robotic single-port surgery: a Korean experience.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Innovations in robotic surgery and recent developments in the SP platform.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-05-31Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The da Vinci single-port system (SPS) has been applied in several fields of surgery; however, only a few studies have reported its applications in general thoracic surgery. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the multi-institutional experiences of applications of SPS in Korea. Methods: The surgical outcomes of three institutions in Korea were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 39 surgeries were performed using SPS without conversion to multiport surgery. The patients included 16 males, and the mean age was 54.2±12.4 years. The most common pathological diagnoses were thymoma (18 cases) and benign cystic lesions (10 cases). The approach used for SPS was subxiphoid, subcostal, and intercostal in 26, 10, and 3 cases, respectively. All patients underwent the surgeries without postoperative complications. The median operation time and peak pain score were 121.4±45.4 min and 3.1±1.1. The median duration of Conclusions: The application of SPS for general thoracic surgery was safe and feasible, whereas its applications remain limited to simple cases. To enable the widespread use of SPS surgery, alleviation of cost-related problems and technical improvement of SPS for complex procedures are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.