Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793966›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Forecasting the concentration of NO2 using statistical and machine learning methods: A case study in the UAE.

Aishah Al Yammahi, Zeyar Aung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exploring PMScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aishah Al YammahiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Zeyar AungDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Khalifa University of Science and Technology · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is the most active pollutant gas emitted in the industrial era and is highly correlated with human activities. Tracking NO2 emissions and predicting their concentrations represent important steps toward controlling pollution and setting rules to protect people's health indoors, such as in factories, and in outdoor environments. The concentration of NO2 was affected by the COVID-19 lockdown period and decreased because of restrictions on outdoor activities. In this study, the concentration of NO2 was predicted at 14 ground stations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) during December 2020 based on training over a full time period of two years (2019-2020). Statistical and machine learning models, such as autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), long short-term memory (LSTM), and nonlinear autoregressive neural network (NAR-NN), are used with both open- and closed-loop architectures. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used to evaluate the performance of the models, and the results ranged from "very good" (MAPE of 8.64% at the Liwa station with the closed loop) to "acceptable" (MAPE of 42.45% at the Khadejah School station with the open loop). The results show that the predictions based on the open loop are generally better than those based on the closed loop because they yield statistically significantly lower MAPE values. For both loop types, we selected stations exhibiting the lowest, medium, and highest MAPE values as representative cases. In addition, we demonstrated that the MAPE value is highly correlated with the relative standard deviation of NO2 concentration values.

Indexed as

ARIMAClassical statisticsLSTMMachine learningNARNO2SARIMA

Identifiers

PMID36793966
PMCPMC9922785
OpenAlexW4313201289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.