Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793791›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Plant-moth community relationships at the degraded urban peat-bog in Central Europe.

Mateusz Płóciennik, Krzysztof Pabis, Angelika Zima, Leszek Kucharski, Robert Sobczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateusz PłóciennikDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology University of Lodz Lodz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-6698
Krzysztof PabisDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology University of Lodz Lodz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-3453
Angelika ZimaDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology University of Lodz Lodz Poland.
Leszek KucharskiDepartment of Biogeography, Palaeoecology and Nature Protection University of Lodz Lodz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-4047
Robert SobczykDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology University of Lodz Lodz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-6058
University of Łódź · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peatlands have their own, specific insect fauna. They are a habitat not only for ubiquistic but also stenotopic moths that feed on plants limited to wet, acid and oligotrophic habitats. In the past, raised bogs and fens were widely distributed in Europe. This has changed since 20th c. Due to irrigation, modern forestry, and increasing human settlement, peatlands have become isolated islands in an agricultural and urban landscape. Here, we analyze the flora in a degraded bog situated in a large Lodz city agglomeration in Poland in relation to the diversity and composition of moth fauna. Over the last 40 years since the bog has become protected as a nature reserve, birch, willow, and alder shrubs replaced the typical raised bog plant communities due to the decreased water level. The analysis of moth communities sampled in 2012 and 2013 indicates dominance of ubiquistic taxa associated with deciduous wetland forests and rushes. Tyrphobiotic and tyrphophile moth taxa were not recorded. We conclude that the absence of moths typical of bog habitats and the dominance of common, woodland species are associated with hydrological changes, the expansion of trees and brushes over typical bog plant communities, and light pollution.

Indexed as

mothsnature protectionpeatlandsplant communitiesplant–moth interaction

Identifiers

PMID36793791
PMCPMC9925946
OpenAlexW4320729832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.