SynthesisComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023
Human Factor Engineering Research for Rehabilitation Robots: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multimodal Therapist-Supervised Robotic Gait-Training Platform with Phase-Synchronized Infrared Thermal Biofeedback: A Concept-Level Technical and Translational Healthcare Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of human factors engineering for rehabilitation robots is based on a "human-centered" design philosophy that strives to provide safe and efficient human-robot interaction training for patients rather than depending on rehabilitation therapists. Human factors engineering for rehabilitation robots is undergoing preliminary investigation. However, the depth and breadth of current research do not provide a complete human factor engineering solution for developing rehabilitation robots. This study aims to provide a systematic review of research at the intersection of rehabilitation robotics and ergonomics to understand the progress and state-of-the-art research on critical human factors, issues, and corresponding solutions for rehabilitation robots. A total of 496 relevant studies were obtained from six scientific database searches, reference searches, and citation-tracking strategies. After applying the selection criteria and reading the full text of each study, 21 studies were selected for review and classified into four categories based on their human factor objectives: implementation of high safety, implementation of lightweight and high comfort, implementation of high human-robot interaction, and performance evaluation index and system studies. Based on the results of the studies, recommendations for future research are presented and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.