Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793688›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2023

Ten years of demographic modelling of divergence and speciation in the sea.

Aurélien De Jode, Alan Le Moan, Kerstin Johannesson, Rui Faria, Sean Stankowski, Anja Marie Westram, Roger K Butlin, Marina Rafajlović, Christelle Fraïsse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic analyses inEvolution letters · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring coral speciation: Multiple sympatricEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aurélien De JodeDepartment of Marine Sciences-Tjärnö University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-439X
Alan Le MoanDepartment of Marine Sciences-Tjärnö University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-6844
Kerstin JohannessonDepartment of Marine Sciences-Tjärnö University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-7986
Rui FariaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.
Sean StankowskiInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria) Klosterneuburg Austria.
Anja Marie WestramInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria) Klosterneuburg Austria.
Roger K ButlinDepartment of Marine Sciences-Tjärnö University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Marina RafajlovićDepartment of Marine Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2177-4622
Christelle FraïsseUMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, CNRS Univ. Lille Lille France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding population divergence that eventually leads to speciation is essential for evolutionary biology. High species diversity in the sea was regarded as a paradox when strict allopatry was considered necessary for most speciation events because geographical barriers seemed largely absent in the sea, and many marine species have high dispersal capacities. Combining genome-wide data with demographic modelling to infer the demographic history of divergence has introduced new ways to address this classical issue. These models assume an ancestral population that splits into two subpopulations diverging according to different scenarios that allow tests for periods of gene flow. Models can also test for heterogeneities in population sizes and migration rates along the genome to account, respectively, for background selection and selection against introgressed ancestry. To investigate how barriers to gene flow arise in the sea, we compiled studies modelling the demographic history of divergence in marine organisms and extracted preferred demographic scenarios together with estimates of demographic parameters. These studies show that geographical barriers to gene flow do exist in the sea but that divergence can also occur without strict isolation. Heterogeneity of gene flow was detected in most population pairs suggesting the predominance of semipermeable barriers during divergence. We found a weak positive relationship between the fraction of the genome experiencing reduced gene flow and levels of genome-wide differentiation. Furthermore, we found that the upper bound of the 'grey zone of speciation' for our dataset extended beyond that found before, implying that gene flow between diverging taxa is possible at higher levels of divergence than previously thought. Finally, we list recommendations for further strengthening the use of demographic modelling in speciation research. These include a more balanced representation of taxa, more consistent and comprehensive modelling, clear reporting of results and simulation studies to rule out nonbiological explanations for general results.

Indexed as

demographic inferencegrey zone of speciationheterogeneous gene flowmarine speciationprimary and secondary contactreproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID36793688
PMCPMC9923478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.