Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793667›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2023

Impact of Age on Functional Outcome After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Proximal Humerus Fractures or Their Sequelae.

Derek S Stenquist, James Barger, Amin Mohamadi, Michael J Weaver, Nishant Suneja, George S M Dyer, Arvind von Keudell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From the last 100 to the first 100-outcome after a manufacturer change in reverse fracture arthroplasty.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Derek S StenquistHarvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA.
James BargerHarvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA.
Amin MohamadiCenter for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Michael J WeaverDivision of Orthopaedic Trauma, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA.
Nishant SunejaOrthopaedic Trauma Service, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
George S M DyerHarvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA.
Arvind von KeudellOrthopaedic Geriatric Trauma Surgery and Research, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat displaced, unstable 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has traditionally been reserved for patients over 70 years old. However, recent data suggest that nearly one-third of all patients treated with RSA for PHF are between 55-69 years old. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus patients older than 70 years of age treated with RSA for a PHF or fracture sequelae. Methods: All patients who underwent primary RSA for acute PHF or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion) between 2004 and 2016 were identified. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus older than 70. Bivariate and survival analyses were performed to evaluate for survival complications, functional outcomes, and implant survival differences. Results: A total of 115 patients were identified, including 39 patients in the young group and 76 cases in the older group. In addition, 40 patients (43.5%) returned functional outcomes surveys at an average of 5.51 years (average age range: 3.04-11.0 years). There were no significant differences in complications, reoperation, implant survival, range of motion, DASH (27.9 vs 23.8, P=0.46), PROMIS (43.3 vs 43.6, P=0.93), or EQ5D (0.75 vs 0.80, P=0.36) scores between the two age cohorts. Conclusion: At a minimum of 3 years after RSA for a complex PHF or fracture sequelae, we found no significant difference in complications, reoperation rates, or functional outcomes between younger patients with an average age of 64 years and older patients with an average age of 78 years. To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine the impact of age on outcome after RSA for the treatment of a proximal humerus fracture. These findings indicate that functional outcomes are acceptable to patients younger than 70 in the short term, but more studies are needed. Patients should be counseled that the long-term durability of RSA performed for fractures in young, active patients remains unknown.

Indexed as

AgeArthroplastyFunctionOutcomeShoulder fracture

Identifiers

PMID36793667
PMCPMC9903306
OpenAlexW4321003894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.