ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Semi-automated three-dimensional segmentation for cardiac CT images using deep learning and randomly distributed points.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), the segmentation of the heart on cardiac computed tomography (CT) remains of great importance. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and intra-and inter-observer variabilities yield inconsistent and inaccurate results. Computer-assisted, and in particular, deep learning approaches to segmentation continue to potentially offer an accurate, efficient alternative to manual segmentation. However, fully automated methods for cardiac segmentation have yet to achieve accurate enough results to compete with expert segmentation. Thus, we focus on a semi-automated deep learning approach to cardiac segmentation that bridges the divide between a higher accuracy from manual segmentation and higher efficiency from fully automated methods. In this approach, we selected a fixed number of points along the surface of the cardiac region to mimic user interaction. Points-distance maps were then generated from these points selections, and a three-dimensional (3D) fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) was trained using points-distance maps to provide a segmentation prediction. Testing our method with different numbers of selected points, we achieved a Dice score from 0.742 to 0.917 across the four chambers. Specifically. Dice scores averaged 0.846 ± 0.059, 0.857 ± 0.052, 0.826 ± 0.062, and 0.824 ± 0.062 for the left atrium, left ventricle, right atrium, and right ventricle, respectively across all points selections. This point-guided, image-independent, deep learning segmentation approach illustrated a promising performance for chamber-by-chamber delineation of the heart in CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.