ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023
Prioritization of patients for germline testing based on tumor profiling of hematopoietic malignancies.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting likely germline variants during tumor-based molecular profiling.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Inherited Predispositions to Myeloid Neoplasms: Pathogenesis and Clinical Implications.Annual review of pathology · 2025Review
- Donor-Derived Malignancy and Transplantation Morbidity: Risks of Patient and Donor Genetics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Review
- Germline predisposition traits in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: a survey-based study and position paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.The Lancet. Haematology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Germline predisposition to hematopoietic malignancies is more common than previously appreciated, with several clinical guidelines advocating for cancer risk testing in an expanding pool of patients. As molecular profiling of tumor cells becomes a standard practice for prognostication and defining options for targeted therapies, recognition that germline variants are present in all cells and can be identified by such testing becomes paramount. Although not to be substituted for proper germline cancer risk testing, tumor-based profiling can help prioritize DNA variants likely to be of germline origin, especially when they are present on sequential samples and persist into remission. Performing germline genetic testing as early during patient work-up as possible allows time to plan allogeneic stem cell transplantation using appropriate donors and optimize post-transplant prophylaxis. Health care providers need to be attentive to the differences between molecular profiling of tumor cells and germline genetic testing regarding ideal sample types, platform designs, capabilities, and limitations, to allow testing data to be interpreted as comprehensively as possible. The myriad of mutation types and growing number of genes involved in germline predisposition to hematopoietic malignancies makes reliance on detection of deleterious alleles using tumor-based testing alone very difficult and makes understanding how to ensure adequate testing of appropriate patients paramount.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.