Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793591›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2022

A scalable hierarchical lasso for gene-environment interactions.

Natalia Zemlianskaia, W James Gauderman, Juan Pablo Lewinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia ZemlianskaiaDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University or Southern California.
W James GaudermanDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University or Southern California.
Juan Pablo LewingerDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University or Southern California.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Integrative Genomics in CancerP01CA196569 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI David V Conti · 2016 to 2026
$25.5M
Using Functional Genomics to Inform Gene Environment Interactions for Colorectal CancerR01CA201407 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CASEY, GRAHAM, GAUDERMAN, WILLIAM JAMES · 2016 to 2020
$9.6M
Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32ES013678 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GAUDERMAN, WILLIAM JAMES, MCCONNELL, ROB S · 2006 to 2023
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA196569NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201407NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES013678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a regularized regression model for the selection of gene-environment (G×E) interactions. The model focuses on a single environmental exposure and induces a main-effect-before-interaction hierarchical structure. We propose an efficient fitting algorithm and screening rules that can discard large numbers of irrelevant predictors with high accuracy. We present simulation results showing that the model outperforms existing joint selection methods for (G×E) interactions in terms of selection performance, scalability and speed, and provide a real data application. Our implementation is available in the gesso R package.

Indexed as

hierarchical variable selectionjoint analysisscreening rules

Identifiers

PMID36793591
PMCPMC9928188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.