ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Heterogeneous recurrent spiking neural network for spatio-temporal classification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Femtojoule optical nonlinearity for deep learning with incoherent illumination.Science advances · 2025Article
- Direct training high-performance deep spiking neural networks: a review of theories and methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Co-learning synaptic delays, weights and adaptation in spiking neural networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Composing recurrent spiking neural networks using locally-recurrent motifs and risk-mitigating architectural optimization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Design and Development of an Imitation Detection System for Human Action Recognition Using Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiking Neural Networks are often touted as brain-inspired learning models for the third wave of Artificial Intelligence. Although recent SNNs trained with supervised backpropagation show classification accuracy comparable to deep networks, the performance of unsupervised learning-based SNNs remains much lower. This paper presents a heterogeneous recurrent spiking neural network (HRSNN) with unsupervised learning for spatio-temporal classification of video activity recognition tasks on RGB (KTH, UCF11, UCF101) and event-based datasets (DVS128 Gesture). We observed an accuracy of 94.32% for the KTH dataset, 79.58% and 77.53% for the UCF11 and UCF101 datasets, respectively, and an accuracy of 96.54% on the event-based DVS Gesture dataset using the novel unsupervised HRSNN model. The key novelty of the HRSNN is that the recurrent layer in HRSNN consists of heterogeneous neurons with varying firing/relaxation dynamics, and they are trained via heterogeneous spike-time-dependent-plasticity (STDP) with varying learning dynamics for each synapse. We show that this novel combination of heterogeneity in architecture and learning method outperforms current homogeneous spiking neural networks. We further show that HRSNN can achieve similar performance to state-of-the-art backpropagation trained supervised SNN, but with less computation (fewer neurons and sparse connection) and less training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.