Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

What Helping Babies Breathe knowledge and skills are formidable for healthcare workers?

Archana B Patel, Akash Bang, Kunal Kurhe, Savita Bhargav, Patricia L Hibberd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Healthcare simulation and contextually relevant primary care training curricula in Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana B PatelResearch Unit, Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India.
Akash BangDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Kunal KurheResearch Unit, Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India.
Savita BhargavResearch Unit, Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India.
Patricia L HibberdDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lata Medical Research Foundation · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur · INBoston University · US

Funding

Boston University/Lata Medical Research Foundation Global Network for Women's Children's Health Research UnitUG1HD078439 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Patricia L Hibberd · 2018 to 2026
$5.5M
Improving Quality of Care for the Treatment of Childhood PneumoniaU01HD058322 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI HIBBERD, PATRICIA L · 2008 to 2012
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD058322NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Most neonatal deaths occur in the first week of life, due to birth asphyxia. Helping Babies Breathe (HBB), is a simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training program to improve knowledge and skills. There is little information on which knowledge items or skill steps are challenging for the learners. Methods: We used training data from NICHD's Global Network study to understand the items most challenging for Birth Attendants (BA) to guide future curriculum modifications. HBB training was provided in 15 primary, secondary and tertiary level care facilities in Nagpur, India. Refresher training was provided 6 months later. Each knowledge item and skill step was ranked from difficulty level 1 to 6 based on whether 91%-100%, 81%-90%, 71%-80%, 61%-70%, 51%-60% or <50% of learners answered/performed the step correctly. Results: The initial HBB training was conducted in 272 physicians and 516 midwives of which 78 (28%) physicians and 161 (31%) midwives received refresher training. Questions related to timing of cord clamping, management of a meconium-stained baby, and steps to improve ventilation were most difficult for both physicians and midwives. The initial steps of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)-A i.e. equipment checking, removing wet linen and immediate skin-to-skin contact were most difficult for both groups. Midwives missed stimulating newborns while physicians missed cord clamping and communicating with mother. In OSCE-B, starting ventilation in the first minute of life was the most missed step after both initial and 6 months refresher training for physicians and midwives. At the retraining, the retention was worst for cutting the cord (physicians level 3), optimal rate of ventilation, improving ventilation & counting heart rate (midwives level 3), calling for help (both groups level 3) and scenario ending step of monitoring the baby and communicating with mother (physicians level 4, midwives 3). Conclusion: All BAs found skill testing more difficult than knowledge testing. The difficulty level was more for midwives than for physicians. So, the HBB training duration and frequency of retraining can be tailored accordingly. This study will also inform subsequent refinement in the curriculum so that both trainers and trainees will be able to achieve the required proficiency.

Indexed as

HBBHelping Babies Breatheknowledgeneonatal resuscitationskillstraining

Identifiers

PMID36793503
PMCPMC9922883
OpenAlexW4318465101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.