ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2023
The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps.
Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic analysis of the gender disparities in oncology journal editorial boards.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Mastering Abstract Review for Medical Education Conferences: Fundamental Tips to Grow and Support Scholars.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- The value of joint peer review between early career researchers and supervisors.Trends in cell biology · 2025Article
- Scientific criticism. A plea for continuous and open peer review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Of editorial processes, AI models, and medical literature: the Magnetic Resonance Audiometry experiment.European radiology · 2024Article
- Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions.Materials horizons · 2024Review
- The importance of debunking constructions.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The critical role of peer reviewers in the publishing process is examined. Examples of typical challenges are provided, including the relative lack of rewards for this important task. Particular attention is paid to the need to consider the diversity of the peer reviewers recruited and impediments to the selection beyond Areas of Competence, often due to the small available pool. Finally, recommendations for improvement are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.