ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Implantable biomedical materials for treatment of bone infection.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinspired and living multiscale composites for regenerative medicine in the treatment of surgical site infections.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Pitaya‑inspired compartmentalized microspheres with natural tannic acid-copper coating orchestrate smart release of ions and multi-drugs for synergistic treatment of infected bone defects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Research Progress in Medical Biomaterials for Bone Infections.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Antibiotics release by hybrid bone scaffold: relationship between kinetic profiles and scaffold intrinsic features.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Osteoinductive Potential of Bacterial Pyomelanin Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Application of antibiotic bone cement combined with lobulated perforator flap based on descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery in treatment of infected traumatic tissue defects of foot.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Synthesis and evaluation of nanosystem containing chondroitinase ABCI based on hydroxyapatite.AMB Express · 2024Article
- Enhancing Bone Grafting Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Antibacterial Artificial Composite Bone Scaffolds.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of bone infections has always been difficult. The emergence of drug-resistant bacteria has led to a steady decline in the effectiveness of antibiotics. It is also especially important to fight bacterial infections while repairing bone defects and cleaning up dead bacteria to prevent biofilm formation. The development of biomedical materials has provided us with a research direction to address this issue. We aimed to review the current literature, and have summarized multifunctional antimicrobial materials that have long-lasting antimicrobial capabilities that promote angiogenesis, bone production, or "killing and releasing." This review provides a comprehensive summary of the use of biomedical materials in the treatment of bone infections and a reference thereof, as well as encouragement to perform further research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.