ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Analysis of proportions using arcsine transform with any experimental design.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relation of spatial skills, spatial memory span, and two anxiety types with statistics anxiety in European and North American University students.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Article
- Brain-structural differences underlying dialect competence in the bilingual network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reevaluating statistical methods for proportion-based laboratory outcomes in assisted reproduction.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Task-control adaptation in task switching: Uncovering the mechanisms behind the list-wide proportion valency effect.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association and haplotype analyses reveal genetic architecture of seed dormancy in grain sorghum with implications for preharvest sprouting tolerance.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Unveiling the neural network involved in mentally projecting the self through episodic autobiographical memories.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AmelOBP4: an antenna-specific odor-binding protein gene required for olfactory behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).Frontiers in zoology · 2025Article
- Relative age effects and player pathways in international ice hockey: a longitudinal multi-cohort analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Review and revamp of compositional data transformation: A new framework combining proportion conversion and contrast transformation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Pollen foraging preferences in honey bees and the nutrient profiles of the pollen.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Impact of ZnO and FePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Opportune moments for task interruptions: examining the cognitive mechanisms underlying interruption-timing effects.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Analysis of proportions using arcsine transform with any experimental design.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Exact tests on proportions exist for single-group and two-group designs, but no general test on proportions exists that is appropriate for any experimental design involving more than two groups, repeated measures, and/or factorial designs. Method: Herein, we extend the analysis of proportions using arcsine transform to any sort of design. The resulting framework, which we have called Result: We illustrate the method with a few examples (single-factor design, two-factor design, within-subject design, and mixed design) and explore type I error rates with Monte Carlo simulations. We also examine power computation and confidence intervals for proportions. Discussion: ANOPA is a complete series of analyses for proportions, applicable to any design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.