Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Partnering with community-based organizations to improve equitable access to depression care for underserved older adults in the U.S.: Qualitative formative research.

Lesley E Steinman, Amanda T Parrish, Marlana J Kohn, Sherry Wu, KeliAnne K Hara-Hubbard, Lori Brown, Syed Imam, Barbara Baquero, Peggy A Hannon, Mark B Snowden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lesley E SteinmanHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Amanda T ParrishHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Marlana J KohnHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sherry WuHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
KeliAnne K Hara-HubbardHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Lori BrownSoutheast Washington Aging and Long-Term Care, Yakima, WA, United States.
Syed ImamUnion for Pan Asian Communities (UPAC) Positive Solutions Program, San Diego, CA, United States.
Barbara BaqueroHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Peggy A HannonHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Mark B SnowdenHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CenterU48DP006398 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HANNON, MARGARET A · 2018 to 2023
$11.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Embedding evidenced-based programs (EBPs) like PEARLS outside clinical settings can help reduce inequities in access to depression care. Trusted community-based organizations (CBOs) reach older adults who are underserved; however, PEARLS adoption has been limited. Implementation science has tried to close this know-do gap, however a more intentional focus on equity is needed to engage CBOs. We partnered with CBOs to better understand their resources and needs in order to design more equitable dissemination and implementation (D&I) strategies to support PEARLS adoption. Methods: We conducted 39 interviews with 24 current and potential adopter organizations and other partners (February-September 2020). CBOs were purposively sampled for region, type, and priority older populations experiencing poverty (communities of color, linguistically diverse, rural). Using a social marketing framework, our guide explored barriers, benefits and process for PEARLS adoption; CBO capacities and needs; PEARLS acceptability and adaptations; and preferred communication channels. During COVID-19, interviews also addressed remote PEARLS delivery and changes in priorities. We conducted thematic analysis of transcripts using the rapid framework method to describe the needs and priorities of older adults who are underserved and the CBOs that engage them, and strategies, collaborations, and adaptations to integrate depression care in these contexts. Results: During COVID-19, older adults relied on CBO support for basic needs such as food and housing. Isolation and depression were also urgent issues within communities, yet stigma remained for both late-life depression and depression care. CBOs wanted EBPs with cultural flexibility, stable funding, accessible training, staff investment, and fit with staff and community needs and priorities. Findings guided new dissemination strategies to better communicate how PEARLS is appropriate for organizations that engage older adults who are underserved, and what program components are core and what are adaptable to better align with organizations and communities. New implementation strategies will support organizational capacity-building through training and technical assistance, and matchmaking for funding and clinical support. Discussion: Findings support CBOs as appropriate depression care providers for older adults who are underserved, and suggest changes to communications and resources to better fit EBPs with the resources and needs of organizations and older adults. We are currently partnering with organizations in California and Washington to evaluate whether and how these D&I strategies increase equitable access to PEARLS for older adults who are underserved.

Indexed as

COVID-19DepressionAgedHumansPovertyQualitative ResearchWashingtoncommunity-based organizationsdepressiondisseminationequityimplementationolder adults

Identifiers

PMID36793362
PMCPMC9922751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.