ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Significant fibrosis assessed by liver biopsy among Chinese bariatric surgery patients: A prospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibrosis-4 Score and Postoperative Outcomes in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of bariatric surgery on liver fibrosis indices among type 2 diabetes patients in a national cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease undergoing bariatric surgery.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibrosis stages affect clinical prognoses related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, data on the prevalence and clinical features of significant fibrosis are scarce in Chinese bariatric surgery patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of significant fibrosis in bariatric surgery patients and to identify its predictors. Methods: We prospectively enrolled the patients performing intra-operative liver biopsies during bariatric surgery from a bariatric surgery center in a university hospital between May 2020 and January 2022. Anthropometric characteristics, co-morbidities, laboratory data and pathology reports were collected and analyzed. The performance of non-invasive models was evaluated. Results: Of 373 patients, 68.9%% had non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and 60.9% exhibited fibrosis. Significant fibrosis was present in 9.1% of patients, advanced fibrosis in 4.0%, and cirrhosis in 1.6%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; p=0.003), presence of diabetes (OR, 2.62; p=0.019), elevated c- peptide (OR, 1.26; p=0.025) and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR, 1.02; p=0.004) were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. The non-invasive models, AST to Platelet ratio (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and Hepamet fibrosis scores (HFS) provided greater accuracy for predicting significant fibrosis, compared to the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) and BARD score. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of bariatric surgery patients had NASH and the prevalence of significant fibrosis was high. Elevated levels of AST and c- peptide, advanced age and diabetes indicated a higher risk of significant fibrosis. Non-invasive models, APRI, FIB-4 and HFS can be used to identify significant liver fibrosis in bariatric surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.