Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793139›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2023

Rapid qualitative analysis approach to stakeholder and client interviews to inform mobile-based HIV testing in the U.S. Deep South.

Madeline C Pratt, Oluwaseyi O Isehunwa, Ingrid V Bassett, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Bretia Gordon, Lynn T Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Balancing Trade-Offs in Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Rapid Evaluation: Reflections and Lessons.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeline C PrattDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ziegler Research Building 210, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. mcpratt@uabmc.edu.
Oluwaseyi O IsehunwaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ziegler Research Building 210, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Ingrid V BassettDivision of Infectious Disease and Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mirjam-Colette KempfDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ziegler Research Building 210, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Bretia GordonMedical Advocacy and Outreach, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Lynn T MatthewsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ziegler Research Building 210, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OLAF KUTSCH · 1988 to 2026
$84.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe severity of the HIV epidemic in the United States' rural South highlights geographic, socioeconomic, and racial disparities that disproportionately affect poor Black Americans. Approximately 16% of Alabamians living with HIV remain undiagnosed and just 37% of rural Alabamians have ever been tested for HIV.

methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with 22 key stakeholders involved in HIV prevention, testing, treatment, or community health initiatives, and 10 adults living in rural communities across Alabama to explore HIV testing challenges and opportunities. We utilized a rapid qualitative analysis approach and engaged community partners for feedback and discussion. This analysis will inform the implementation of a mobile HIV testing service in rural Alabama.

resultsThe following themes were identified: (1) Cultural norms, racism, poverty, and rurality impair access to healthcare. (2) Lack of sex education, low knowledge of HIV and perception of risk reinforce stigmas. (3) Messaging about "Undetectable = Untransmissible" (U = U) is not well understood in communities. (4) Community involvement may promote communication and trust between communities and testing advocates. (5) Novel testing strategies are acceptable and may diminish barriers.

conclusionsWorking with community "gatekeepers" may be a key strategy to understand and promote acceptability of interventions new to rural Alabama and ameliorate stigma within communities. The implementation of new HIV testing strategies requires building and maintaining relationships with advocates, especially faith-based leaders, who engage people across many demographics.

Indexed as

HIV testingImplementation scienceRapid Qualitative AnalysisRuralSexual Health

Identifiers

PMID36793139
PMCPMC9930722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.