Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793076›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Towards a clinically-based common coordinate framework for the human gut cell atlas: the gut models.

Albert Burger, Richard A Baldock, David J Adams, Shahida Din, Irene Papatheodorou, Michael Glinka, Bill Hill, Derek Houghton, Mehran Sharghi, Michael Wicks and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Characterizing Low-cost Registration for Photographic Images to Computed Tomography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  4. A Roadmap for the Human Gut Cell Atlas.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Albert BurgerDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. a.g.burger@hw.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-8635
Richard A BaldockDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-6877
David J AdamsExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9490-0306
Shahida DinEdinburgh IBD Unit Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2855-3400
Irene PapatheodorouEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-5470
Michael GlinkaDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8278-5555
Bill HillDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8988-0627
Derek HoughtonDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Mehran SharghiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-9231
Michael WicksDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4390-4654
Mark J ArendsDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. m.arends@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6826-8770
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBNHS Lothian · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Human Cell Atlas resource will deliver single cell transcriptome data spatially organised in terms of gross anatomy, tissue location and with images of cellular histology. This will enable the application of bioinformatics analysis, machine learning and data mining revealing an atlas of cell types, sub-types, varying states and ultimately cellular changes related to disease conditions. To further develop the understanding of specific pathological and histopathological phenotypes with their spatial relationships and dependencies, a more sophisticated spatial descriptive framework is required to enable integration and analysis in spatial terms.

methodsWe describe a conceptual coordinate model for the Gut Cell Atlas (small and large intestines). Here, we focus on a Gut Linear Model (1-dimensional representation based on the centreline of the gut) that represents the location semantics as typically used by clinicians and pathologists when describing location in the gut. This knowledge representation is based on a set of standardised gut anatomy ontology terms describing regions in situ, such as ileum or transverse colon, and landmarks, such as ileo-caecal valve or hepatic flexure, together with relative or absolute distance measures. We show how locations in the 1D model can be mapped to and from points and regions in both a 2D model and 3D models, such as a patient's CT scan where the gut has been segmented.

resultsThe outputs of this work include 1D, 2D and 3D models of the human gut, delivered through publicly accessible Json and image files. We also illustrate the mappings between models using a demonstrator tool that allows the user to explore the anatomical space of the gut. All data and software is fully open-source and available online.

conclusionsSmall and large intestines have a natural "gut coordinate" system best represented as a 1D centreline through the gut tube, reflecting functional differences. Such a 1D centreline model with landmarks, visualised using viewer software allows interoperable translation to both a 2D anatomogram model and multiple 3D models of the intestines. This permits users to accurately locate samples for data comparison.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalSoftwareHumansCommon coordinate frameworkHuman cell atlasHuman gut cell atlas

Identifiers

PMID36793076
PMCPMC9933383
OpenAlexW4320914517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.