Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793066›Full record

ReviewMilitary Medical Research2023

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care.

Henry T Peng, M Musaab Siddiqui, Shawn G Rhind, Jing Zhang, Luis Teodoro da Luz, Andrew Beckett

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military Medical Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Recent advances in biomarkers for cardiac fibrosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Education: Applications, Ethics, and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Novel Machine-Learning Modeling of Facial Trauma Volume With Regional Event and Weather Data.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henry T PengDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada. henry.peng@drdc-rddc.gc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-9573
M Musaab SiddiquiDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada.
Shawn G RhindDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada.
Jing ZhangDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada.
Luis Teodoro da LuzSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Andrew BeckettSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Defence Research and Development Canada · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of machine learning (ML) has been increasingly employed in the research of trauma in various aspects. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of trauma-related death. To better elucidate the current role of AI and contribute to future development of ML in trauma care, we conducted a review focused on the use of ML in the diagnosis or treatment strategy of traumatic hemorrhage. A literature search was carried out on PubMed and Google scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and, if deemed appropriate, the full articles were reviewed. We included 89 studies in the review. These studies could be grouped into five areas: (1) prediction of outcomes; (2) risk assessment and injury severity for triage; (3) prediction of transfusions; (4) detection of hemorrhage; and (5) prediction of coagulopathy. Performance analysis of ML in comparison with current standards for trauma care showed that most studies demonstrated the benefits of ML models. However, most studies were retrospective, focused on prediction of mortality, and development of patient outcome scoring systems. Few studies performed model assessment via test datasets obtained from different sources. Prediction models for transfusions and coagulopathy have been developed, but none is in widespread use. AI-enabled ML-driven technology is becoming integral part of the whole course of trauma care. Comparison and application of ML algorithms using different datasets from initial training, testing and validation in prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted for provision of decision support for individualized patient care as far forward as possible.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency Medical ServicesHemorrhageHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceHemorrhageInjuryMachine learningTrauma

Identifiers

PMID36793066
PMCPMC9933281
OpenAlexW4321003837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.