ArticleBMC medical education2023
Using a consensus meeting to enhance fracture care education in low income countries.
Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intersectoral Collaboration Between Traditional Bonesetters and Formal Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Past Initiatives and Stakeholder Perspectives.World journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Impact on outcomes of a personalized educational intervention for surgeons in the management of open tibial fractures in Latin America: a before-and-after study in three low- and middle-income countries.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Observational
- Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA key strategy to building surgical capacity in low income countries involves training care providers, particularly in the interventions highlighted by the Lancet Commission for Global Surgery, including the management of open fractures. This is a common injury, especially in areas with a high incidence of road traffic incidents. The aim of this study was to use a nominal group consensus method to design a course on open fracture management for clinical officers in Malawi.
methodsThe nominal group meeting was held over two days, including clinical officers and surgeons from Malawi and the UK with various levels of expertise in the fields of global surgery, orthopaedics and education. The group was posed with questions on course content, delivery and evaluation. Each participant was encouraged to suggest an answer and the advantages and disadvantages of each suggestion were discussed before voting through an anonymous online platform. Voting included use of a Likert scale or ranking available options. Ethical approval for this process was obtained from the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee Malawi and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
resultsAll suggested course topics received an average score of greater than 8 out of 10 on a Likert scale and were included in the final programme. Videos was the highest ranking option as a method for delivering pre-course material. The highest ranking methods for each course topic included lectures, videos and practicals. When asked what practical skill should be tested at the end of the course, the highest ranking option was "initial assessment".
conclusionThis work outlines how a consensus meeting can be used to design an educational intervention to improve patient care and outcomes. Through combining the perspectives of both the trainer and trainee, the course aligns both agendas so that it is relevant and sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.