ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Comparison of visual outcomes, keratometric parameters and biomechanical profiles between deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with big-bubble technique vs. Melles technique for keratoconus: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComparing results of two different DALK surgery techniques (big bubble vs. Melles) in patients with advanced keratoconus.
designa retrospective comparative clinical study.
participantsThis study conducted on 72 eyes of 72 participants.
introductionThis study designed to compare the results of two different DALK surgery techniques (big bubble vs. Melles) in patients with advanced keratoconus.
methodThirty-seven eyes were treated using the big bubble DALK method, while 35 eyes were treated using the Melles approach. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA), manifest refraction, keratometric characteristics, contrast sensitivity, corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical characteristics, and endothelial cell profile are the outcome measurements.
resultsMean UCVA in big bubble group was 0.61 ± 25 LogMAR and in Melles group was 0.89 ± 0.41 LogMAR (p-value 0.043). Mean BCSVA in big bubble group (0.18 ± 0.12 Log MAR) was significantly better than Melles group (0.35 ± 0.16 Log MAR). Mean of sphere and cylinder refraction showed no significant difference between two groups. Comparing the endothelial cell profile, corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical properties and keratometry had no significantdifferences. Contrast sensitivity reported as modulation transfer function (MTF) showed higher values in big bubble group and differences with Melles group weresignificant. Results of point spread function (PSF) in big bubble group had superiority to Melles group with considerable statistical P value of 0.023.
conclusionWhen opposed to the Melles approach, the big bubble technique generates a smooth interface with less stromal residue, which results in higher visual quality and contrast sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.