Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793002›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Is prior cancer history a hindrance for non-small cell lung cancer patients to participate in clinical trials?

Jing-Sheng Cai, Yun Li, Xun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing-Sheng CaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China.
Yun LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China. surgeonli@hotmail.com.
Xun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, People's Republic of China. wangxun04275@pkuph.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to explore the effect of a prior cancer history on the survivals of resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

methodsKaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test was used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to reduce bias. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized Cox multivariable analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors.

resultsA total of 4,102 eligible cases were included in this study. The rate of patients with a prior cancer was 8.2% (338/4,102). Patients with a prior cancer tended to be younger and have early-stage tumors when compared with those without prior cancer. Before PSM, the survivals of the patients with a prior cancer were similar to those of the patients without prior cancer (OS: P = 0.591; DFS: P = 0.847). After PSM, patients with a prior cancer and those without prior cancer still had comparable survival rates (OS: P = 0.126; DFS: P = 0.054). The LASSO-penalized multivariable Cox analysis further confirmed that a prior cancer history was not a prognostic factor for both OS and DFS.

conclusionsA prior cancer history was not associated with resected NSCLC patients' survivals, and we proposed that it might be reasonable for clinical trials to enroll the NSCLC patients with a prior cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesNon-small cell lung cancerPrior cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36793002
PMCPMC9930244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.