ArticleScientific reports2023
Effects of saccade delay, side of deficit, and training on detection of catch-up saccades during head-impulse test in virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leadership Perceptions, Educational Struggles and Barriers, and Effective Modalities for Teaching Vertigo and the HINTS Exam: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Residency Program Directors.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin to train emergency physicians to examine dizzy patients using the HINTS method.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a training simulator for the examination of dizzy patients based on a virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin (VREM) was developed to evaluate the detection of catch-up saccades during head impulse test (HIT) and the effect of training in VREM. For novices (n = 35), 2 trials were conducted before and after a training session. Experts (n = 7) were submitted to an evaluation session. In each trial, a left or a right horizontal canal deficit with an overt catch-up saccade (delay between 110 and 320 ms) was randomly presented. Participants scored the difficulty in performing the maneuver, in recognizing the saccades, and the self-confidence in the diagnosis using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Saccade delay significantly influenced the performance. Training significantly improved the sensitivity in the residents (69.1% before to 97.9% after the training, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test, n = 560 tests), surpassing experts' performances (p < 0.001, versus 87% in experts, Fisher's exact test). The specificity also increased to the expert level (78% before to 95% after the training, and 95% in experts, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). The VAS showed a decrease difficulty to execute the HIT, with an increase in the confidence after training. VREM improved the HIT execution performance and the confidence in novice practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.