Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792720›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Efficient breast cancer mammograms diagnosis using three deep neural networks and term variance.

Ahmed S Elkorany, Zeinab F Elsharkawy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attention-guided erasing for enhanced transfer learning in breast abnormality classification.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed S ElkoranyDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Comm. Eng., Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, 32952, Egypt.
Zeinab F ElsharkawyEngineering Department, Nuclear Research Center, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt. zeinab_elsharkawy@yahoo.com.
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority · EGMenoufia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is spreading more and more every day. Therefore, a patient's life can be saved by its early discovery. Mammography is frequently used to diagnose BC. The classification of mammography region of interest (ROI) patches (i.e., normal, malignant, or benign) is the most crucial phase in this process since it helps medical professionals to identify BC. In this paper, a hybrid technique that carries out a quick and precise classification that is appropriate for the BC diagnosis system is proposed and tested. Three different Deep Learning (DL) Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models-namely, Inception-V3, ResNet50, and AlexNet-are used in the current study as feature extractors. To extract useful features from each CNN model, our suggested method uses the Term Variance (TV) feature selection algorithm. The TV-selected features from each CNN model are combined and a further selection is performed to obtain the most useful features which are sent later to the multiclass support vector machine (MSVM) classifier. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) image database was used to test the effectiveness of the suggested method for classification. The mammogram's ROI is retrieved, and image patches are assigned to it. Based on the results of testing several TV feature subsets, the 600-feature subset with the highest classification performance was discovered. Higher classification accuracy (CA) is attained when compared to previously published work. The average CA for 70% of training is 97.81%, for 80% of training, it is 98%, and for 90% of training, it reaches its optimal value. Finally, the ablation analysis is performed to emphasize the role of the proposed network's key parameters.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMammographyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36792720
PMCPMC9932150
OpenAlexW4321004434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.