Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792661›Full record

ArticleHeredity2023

Gene based markers improve precision of genome-wide association studies and accuracy of genomic predictions in rice breeding.

Chandrappa Anilkumar, T P Muhammed Azharudheen, Rameswar Prasad Sah, Nagenahalli Chandrappa Sunitha, Basavantraya N Devanna, Bishnu Charan Marndi, Bhaskar Chandra Patra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chandrappa Anilkumar *ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India. anilcgpb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7359-1249
T P Muhammed Azharudheen *ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Rameswar Prasad Sah *ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India. ramesh.pbg@gmail.com.
Nagenahalli Chandrappa SunithaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, 560065, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-4695
Basavantraya N DevannaICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Bishnu Charan MarndiICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Bhaskar Chandra PatraICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is hypothesized that the genome-wide genic markers may increase the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for quantitative traits. To test this hypothesis, a set of candidate gene-based markers for yield and grain traits-related genes cloned across the rice genome were custom-designed. A multi-model, multi-locus genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using new genic markers developed to test their effectiveness for gene discovery. Two multi-locus models, FarmCPU and mrMLM, along with a single-locus mixed linear model (MLM), identified 28 significant marker-trait associations. These associations revealed novel causative alleles for grain weight and pleiotropic associations with other traits. For instance, the marker YD91 derived from the gene OsAAP3 on chromosome 1 was consistently associated with grain weight, while the gene has a significant effect on grain yield. Furthermore, nine genomic selection methods, including regression-based and machine learning-based models, were used to predict grain weight using a leave-one-out five-fold cross-validation approach to optimize the genomic selection model with genic markers. Among nine prediction models, Kernel Hilbert Space Regression (RKHS) is the best among regression-based models, and Random Forest Regression (RFR) is the best among machine learning-based models. Genomic prediction accuracies with and without GWAS significant markers were compared to assess the effectiveness of markers. The rapid decreases in prediction accuracy upon dropping GWAS significant markers indicate the effectiveness of new genic markers in genomic selection. Apart from that, the candidate gene-based markers were found to be more effective in genomic selection programs for better accuracy.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyOryzaEdible GrainGenetic MarkersGenomicsPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID36792661
PMCPMC10163052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.