ArticleHeredity2023
Gene based markers improve precision of genome-wide association studies and accuracy of genomic predictions in rice breeding.
Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- RGPA-GCN: Graph convolutional networks for rice gene-phenotype association prediction.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Integrating image-based phenotyping and GWAS to map resistance to spittlebug nymphs in interspecific Urochloa grasses.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification of genetic determinants for gall midge resistance in rice using genic markers.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- The current state of the use of DNA markers for improving the efficiency of rice breeding in Japan.Breeding science · 2026Article
- Precision breeding in a changing climate: unlocking resilience through omics and gene editing.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics in crop research: using genomic data for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Provides Novel Insights Into the Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Patterns of Runs of Homozygosity in Mud Crab (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Identification of candidate genes for Nilaparvata lugens (stål) resistance through genomic dissection from diverse Indigenous rice genotypes.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- SPDC-HG: An accelerator of genomic hybrid breeding in maize.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Big data and artificial intelligence-aided crop breeding: Progress and prospects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025Review
- Exploiting historical agronomic data to develop genomic prediction strategies for early clonal selection in the Louisiana sugarcane variety development program.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Development of a 101.6K liquid-phased probe for GWAS and genomic selection in pine wilt disease-resistance breeding in Masson pine.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomics-informed elucidation of trait-phenotype relationships and MABB approaches deliver major gene blast resistance in the aromatic rice landraceFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic dissection of green pod yield in dolichos bean, an orphan vegetable legume, using new molecular markers.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Article
- Salinity stress tolerance prediction for biomass-related traits in maize (Zea mays L.) using genome-wide markers.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Genome-wide association studies for a comprehensive understanding of the genetic architecture of culm strength and yield traits in rice.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is hypothesized that the genome-wide genic markers may increase the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for quantitative traits. To test this hypothesis, a set of candidate gene-based markers for yield and grain traits-related genes cloned across the rice genome were custom-designed. A multi-model, multi-locus genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using new genic markers developed to test their effectiveness for gene discovery. Two multi-locus models, FarmCPU and mrMLM, along with a single-locus mixed linear model (MLM), identified 28 significant marker-trait associations. These associations revealed novel causative alleles for grain weight and pleiotropic associations with other traits. For instance, the marker YD91 derived from the gene OsAAP3 on chromosome 1 was consistently associated with grain weight, while the gene has a significant effect on grain yield. Furthermore, nine genomic selection methods, including regression-based and machine learning-based models, were used to predict grain weight using a leave-one-out five-fold cross-validation approach to optimize the genomic selection model with genic markers. Among nine prediction models, Kernel Hilbert Space Regression (RKHS) is the best among regression-based models, and Random Forest Regression (RFR) is the best among machine learning-based models. Genomic prediction accuracies with and without GWAS significant markers were compared to assess the effectiveness of markers. The rapid decreases in prediction accuracy upon dropping GWAS significant markers indicate the effectiveness of new genic markers in genomic selection. Apart from that, the candidate gene-based markers were found to be more effective in genomic selection programs for better accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.