Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792640›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2023

Immunization with matrix-, nucleoprotein and neuraminidase protects against H3N2 influenza challenge in pH1N1 pre-exposed pigs.

Eleni Vatzia, Katherine Feest, Adam McNee, Tanuja Manjegowda, B Veronica Carr, Basudev Paudyal, Tiphany Chrun, Emmanuel A Maze, Amy Mccarron, Susan Morris and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Swine influenza A virus: challenges and novel vaccine strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Construction and application of adenoviral vectors.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleni VatziaThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom. eleni.vatzia@pirbright.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-4962
Katherine FeestThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Adam McNeeThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Tanuja ManjegowdaThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
B Veronica CarrThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Basudev PaudyalThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Tiphany ChrunThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel A MazeThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Amy MccarronThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Susan MorrisNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Helen E EverettAnimal and Plant Health Agency-Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-4265
Ronan MacLoughlinAerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1607
Francisco J SalgueroUnited Kingdom Health Security Agency, UKHSA-Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Teresa LambeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford and Chinese Academy of Medical Science (CAMS) Oxford Institute (COI), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah C GilbertNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9750
Elma TchilianThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom. elma.tchilian@pirbright.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-5118
The Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBAerogen (Ireland) · IEAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007031Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007039Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/COV07001Pirbright Institute BBS/E/I/00007031Pirbright Institute BBS/E/I/00007037Pirbright Institute BBS/E/I/00007039RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/S037160/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for influenza vaccines providing broader protection that may decrease the need for annual immunization of the human population. We investigated the efficacy of heterologous prime boost immunization with chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx2) and modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectored vaccines, expressing conserved influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP), matrix protein 1 (M1) and neuraminidase (NA) in H1N1pdm09 pre-exposed pigs. We compared the efficacy of intra-nasal, aerosol and intra-muscular vaccine delivery against H3N2 influenza challenge. Aerosol prime boost immunization induced strong local lung T cell and antibody responses and abrogated viral shedding and lung pathology following H3N2 challenge. In contrast, intramuscular immunization induced powerful systemic responses and weak local lung responses but also abolished lung pathology and reduced viral shedding. These results provide valuable insights into the development of a broadly protective influenza vaccine in a highly relevant large animal model and will inform future vaccine and clinical trial design.

Identifiers

PMID36792640
PMCPMC9930017
OpenAlexW4321002149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.