Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792379›Full record

ArticleNeurology2023

Association Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and 30-Day Mortality and Readmission for Patients With Common Neurologic Conditions.

Jay B Lusk, Molly N Hoffman, Amy G Clark, Jonathan Bae, Matthew W Luedke, Bradley G Hammill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surviving Severe Acute Brain injury: Care trajectories and missed opportunities.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Hospital Socioeconomic Status and Acute Stroke Treatment in the United States.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay B LuskFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-5728-8872
Molly N HoffmanFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC.
Amy G ClarkFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-9947-4334
Jonathan BaeFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC.
Matthew W LuedkeFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-1564-0241
Bradley G HammillFrom the Duke University School of Medicine (J.B.L., B.G.H.); Duke University Fuqua School of Business (J.B.L.); Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences (M.N.H., A.G.C., B.G.H.); Duke University Health System (J.B.); Duke University Department of Medicine (J.B.); and Duke University Department of Neurology (M.W.L.), Durham, NC. brad.hammill@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-6434
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPatients of low individual socioeconomic status (SES) are at a greater risk of unfavorable health outcomes. However, the association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and health outcomes for patients with neurologic disorders has not been studied at the population level. Our objective was to determine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality and readmission after hospitalization for various neurologic conditions.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of nationwide Medicare claims from 2017 to 2019. We included patients older than 65 years hospitalized for the following broad categories based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): multiple sclerosis and cerebellar ataxia (DRG 058-060); stroke (061-072); degenerative nervous system disorders (056-057); epilepsy (100-101); traumatic coma (082-087), and nontraumatic coma (080-081). The exposure of interest was neighborhood SES, measured by the area deprivation index (ADI), which uses socioeconomic indicators, such as educational attainment, unemployment, infrastructure access, and income, to estimate area-level socioeconomic deprivation at the level of census block groups. Patients were grouped into high, middle, and low neighborhood-level SES based on ADI percentiles. Adjustment covariates included age, comorbidity burden, race/ethnicity, individual SES, and sex.

resultsAfter exclusions, 905,784 patients were included in the mortality analysis and 915,993 were included in the readmission analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity burden, and individual SES, patients from low SES neighborhoods had higher 30-day mortality rates compared with patients from high SES neighborhoods for all disease categories except for multiple sclerosis: magnitudes of the effect ranged from an adjusted odds ratio of 2.46 (95% CI 1.60-3.78) for the nontraumatic coma group to 1.23 (95% CI 1.19-1.28) for the stroke group. After adjustment, no significant differences in readmission rates were observed for any of the groups. DISCUSSION: Neighborhood SES is strongly associated with 30-day mortality for many common neurologic conditions even after accounting for baseline comorbidity burden and individual SES. Strategies to improve health equity should explicitly consider the effect of neighborhood environments on health outcomes.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisStrokeAgedComaHumansMedicarePatient ReadmissionResidence CharacteristicsRetrospective StudiesSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36792379
PMCPMC10136022
OpenAlexW4320892125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.