Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792366›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

polishCLR: A Nextflow Workflow for Polishing PacBio CLR Genome Assemblies.

Jennifer Chang, Amanda R Stahlke, Sivanandan Chudalayandi, Benjamin D Rosen, Anna K Childers, Andrew J Severin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer ChangUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Jamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, Stoneville, Mississippi.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-3765
Amanda R StahlkeUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5724-598X
Sivanandan ChudalayandiGenome Informatics Facility, Office of Biotechnology, Iowa State University, Ames.
Benjamin D RosenUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-8346
Anna K ChildersUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-8539
Andrew J SeverinGenome Informatics Facility, Office of Biotechnology, Iowa State University, Ames.ORCID 0000-0002-8015-9665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-read sequencing has revolutionized genome assembly, yielding highly contiguous, chromosome-level contigs. However, assemblies from some third generation long read technologies, such as Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) continuous long reads (CLR), have a high error rate. Such errors can be corrected with short reads through a process called polishing. Although best practices for polishing non-model de novo genome assemblies were recently described by the Vertebrate Genome Project (VGP) Assembly community, there is a need for a publicly available, reproducible workflow that can be easily implemented and run on a conventional high performance computing environment. Here, we describe polishCLR (https://github.com/isugifNF/polishCLR), a reproducible Nextflow workflow that implements best practices for polishing assemblies made from CLR data. PolishCLR can be initiated from several input options that extend best practices to suboptimal cases. It also provides re-entry points throughout several key processes, including identifying duplicate haplotypes in purge_dups, allowing a break for scaffolding if data are available, and throughout multiple rounds of polishing and evaluation with Arrow and FreeBayes. PolishCLR is containerized and publicly available for the greater assembly community as a tool to complete assemblies from existing, error-prone long-read data.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHaplotypesSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowassemblygenomeNextflowpolishpolishCLRQV

Identifiers

PMID36792366
PMCPMC9985148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.