Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792312›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2023

Atrial functional mitral regurgitation: prevalence, characteristics and outcomes from the National Echo Database of Australia.

Avalon Moonen, Martin K C Ng, David Playford, Geoff Strange, Gregory M Scalia, David S Celermajer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gender Differences in Cardiac Organ Damage in Arterial Hypertension: Assessing the Role of Drug Nonadherence.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Trial
  2. 2025 ESC/EACTS valvular heart disease guidelines: practical updates on mitral and tricuspid regurgitation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Outcomes of Mitral Valve Surgery for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation vs Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Avalon MoonenSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0039-3911
Martin K C NgSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David PlayfordSchool of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Geoff StrangeSchool of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-7119
Gregory M ScaliaThe University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
David S CelermajerSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia David.Celermajer@health.nsw.gov.au.
The University of Sydney · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAtrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is characterised by left atrial and consequent mitral annular dilatation causing mitral regurgitation. AFMR is likely to become more common with population ageing, alongside increases in atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; conditions causing atrial dilatation. Here, we aim to define the prevalence and characterise the patient and survival characteristics of AFMR in the National Echocardiographic Database of Australia (NEDA). METHODS AND

results14 004 adults with moderate or severe FMR were identified from NEDA. AFMR or ventricular FMR (VFMR) was classified by LA size, LV size and LVEF. AFMR was found in 40% (n=5562) and VFMR in 60% (n=8442). Compared with VFMR, the AFMR subgroup were significantly older (mean age 78±11 years), with a higher proportion of females and of AF. Participants were followed up for a median of 65 months (IQR 36-116 months). After adjustment for age, sex, AF, and pulmonary hypertension, the prognosis for VFMR was significantly worse than for AFMR (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.68 for all-cause and 1.73, 95% CI 1.60 to 1.88, p<0.001 for both). After further adjustment for LVEF, mortality rates were similar in VFMR and AFMR patients (HR 0.93, p=NS), though advancing age and pulmonary hypertension remained independently associated with prognosis.

conclusionsAFMR is a common cause of significant functional MR that predominantly affects elderly female patients with AF. Advancing age and pulmonary hypertension independently associated with survival in FMR. Prognosis was better in AFMR compared with VFMR; however, this difference was accounted for by LV systolic impairment and not by MR severity.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHypertension, PulmonaryMitral Valve InsufficiencyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHeart AtriaHumansPrevalencecardiomyopathiesechocardiographymitral valve insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID36792312
PMCPMC9933756
OpenAlexW4320914266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.