Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36792205›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2023

Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Yushi Tsujita, Keitaro Sofue, Eisuke Ueshima, Yoshiko Ueno, Masatoshi Hori, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Takamichi Murakami

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Assessment of viable tumours by [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yushi TsujitaDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Keitaro SofueDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Eisuke UeshimaDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Yoshiko UenoDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Masatoshi HoriDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Masakatsu TsurusakiDepartment of Radiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine.
Takamichi MurakamiDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Kobe University · JPKindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still on the rise in North America and Europe and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The treatment of HCC varies, with surgery and locoregional therapy (LRT) such as radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and radiation therapy being the primary treatment. Currently, systemic therapy with molecular-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is becoming a major treatment option for the unresectable HCC. As the HCC after LRT or systemic therapy often remains unchanged in size and shows loss of contrast effect in contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria, which are usually used to evaluate the treatment response of solid tumors, are not appropriate for HCC. The modified RECIST (mRECIST) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria were developed for HCC, with a focus on viable lesions. The latest 2018 edition of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) also includes a section on the evaluation of treatment response. The cancer microenvironment influences the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. Several studies have examined the utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting the pathological and molecular genetic patterns of HCC. In the future, it may be possible to stratify prognosis and predict treatment response prior to systemic therapy by using pre-treatment imaging findings.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agentshepatocellular carcinomalocoregional therapymagnetic resonance imagingsystemic therapytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36792205
PMCPMC10086401
OpenAlexW4320901399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.